[R]espondent failed to perform with competence in the criminal case by:In re Harlan R. Antler, STIPULATION RE FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DISPOSITION AND ORDER APPROVING (Sept. 20, 2010).
- Performing little, if any, pre-trial case development, planning, or investigation on behalf of Rios.
- Failing to adequately argue motions in limine.
- Failing to make a coherent opening statement.
- Repeatedly failing to ask admissible and relevant questions.
- Repeatedly failing to assert proper objections.
- Repeatedly failing to move to exclude improper testimony.
- Failing to advance a defense theory.
- Repeatedly failing to adequately cross-examine witnesses.
- Failing to properly handle expert witness testimony on gang-related matters.
- Repeatedly failing to properly impeach witnesses’ testimony.
- Failing to adequately prepare Rios for direct and cross examination.
- Repeatedly failing to present evidence or elicit facts on behalf of Rios.
- Failing to diligently perform the services for which he was hire
From 2005 to 2015 this blog presented news items and resources relating to trial advocacy and the legal system, with a focus on Washington State. It was developed to support the Trial Advocacy Program at the University of Washington School of Law, but broadened to include appellate practice, the courts, access to justice, and related topics. It is no longer active.
Monday, March 28, 2011
Poor Trial Ad Skills Lead to Suspension
Calif. Suspends Lawyer Who Botched Gang-Related Shooting Case, Orders Arbitration Over Disputed Fee - ABA Journal, March 18, 2011. The disciplinary proceeding included three counts (with subcounts). The list right out of a Trial Ad syllabus is from Count One:
No comments:
Post a Comment