Empirical legal studies uses social science tools to examine law and legal institutions. These tools can include:
- surveys, e.g.:
- observation and analysis of legal events, e.g.:
- Mary R. Rose, Shari Seidman Diamond & Beth Murphy, Revisiting the Unanimity Requirement: The Behavior of the Non-Unanimous Civil Jury, Northwestern U. L. Rev. (forthcoming), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=825125
Rafael I. Pardo & Michelle R. Lacey, Undue Hardship in the Bankruptcy Courts: An Empirical Assessment of the Discharge of Educational Debt, 74 U. Cin. L. Rev. 405 (2005), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=706761.
- Peter B. Oh, Veil-Piercing, 89 Texas L. Rev. 81 (2010) (dataset of 2,908 cases, 1658-2006), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1557972
- simulations, e.g.:
- economic modeling, e.g.:
How can you learn about this diverse field? What are the leading works, what organizations work in the area, where are there standard datasets to use? A librarian at Fordham has prepared an excellent guide: Alissa Black-Dorward,
Empirical Research (posted April 1, 2011). Tabs lead you to
- General Materials
- Statistical Software and Instruction
- Survey Research
- Banking
- Courts, Judges & Lawyers
- Crime and Criminal Justice
- Economics, Business & Finance
- Environment
- Evidence
- Foreign & International
- Health
- Intellectual Property
- Social Science Statistics
- State Statistics
Some of the information in the guide is tailored to Fordham, but you can find the equivalent here. For instance, our library has many of the books cited (although perhaps with different call numbers) and the UW has its own
Human Subjects Division for ensuring ethical practices. ---------------------------------- This post is copied from
Gallagher Blogs, on the assumption that many readers of Trial Ad Notes don't read the law library's blog (although you're welcome to, of course) but would be interested in this topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment