The executor of an estate sought an order to have the decedent's dog euthanized because the late owner had spoiled it so badly she believed that the dog could not be happy with anyone else. King County Superior Court Judge Hugh C. Todd denied the order on humanitarian grounds.
This story is old news -- it was covered in the Seattle P-I Sept. 10, 1955 -- but, as regular readers of this blog know, I can't resist a good dog story. The case can be seen as a harbinger of arguments made by contemporary animal law advocates who say that animals should be seen as more than personal property. As Judge Todd said: a dog has some rights too.
Hugh C. Todd served on the King County Superior Court from 1934 to 1959. When I checked HistoryLink.org to see if it had anything about him, I found Plot to sink the MV Hiye Maru in Elliott Bay fails on January 20, 1938 (Daryl C. McClary, December 28, 2005). Two Canadian men had conspired to sink a Japanese freighter to aid the China in its war against Japan. One man died of hypothermia while trying to place the bomb; Judge Todd presided over the trial of the survivor. Again, this isn't current news about trials and trial practice, but it's a fascinating story nonetheless. The survivor was acquitted, by the way, because of his testimony that he acted under duress.
Friday, August 31, 2007
The executor of an estate sought an order to have the decedent's dog euthanized because the late owner had spoiled it so badly she believed that the dog could not be happy with anyone else. King County Superior Court Judge Hugh C. Todd denied the order on humanitarian grounds.
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Jeff Yates, Of judicial campaigns and public sentiment, Voir Dire blog, Aug. 16, 2007:
My co-author, Damon Cann, and I recently published a piece in American Politics Research on the dynamics of citizens’ support for their state courts. In our paper “Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens’ Diffuse Support for State Courts,” we find that, among other factors affecting citizens’ perceptions of state courts, judicial elections and campaign contribution concerns were negatively associated with citizens’ views of the legitimacy of state courts.A commenter (Mike Green) says that he's working on a dissertation about judicial elections and has found a difference between partisan and nonpartisan elections: he finds people where judicial elections are nonpartisan are not as informed about judicial issues as those where judicial elections are partisan.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
SR.com: Coe attorneys agree on statement, Spokesman Review, Aug. 29, 2007:
Attorneys agreed today on the wording that will be presented to the jury in the civil commitment trial of South Hill rapist Kevin Coe after he refused to take part in an evaluation that would have tested his arousal levels to images of forced sex.The civil commitment trial is scheduled for March.
One of the state's attorneys on the case is Trial Ad instructor Malcolm Ross.
Saturday, August 25, 2007
Prof. Shari Seidman Diamond looks at the state of jury research in Beyond Fantasy and Nightmare: A Portrait of the Jury, 54 Buffalo L. Rev. 717 (2006).
This is a very helpful introduction to the field. Prof. Diamond begins by laying out 10 common claims about juries -- e.g., that civil juries are pro-plaintiff, that jury selection determines the outcome of cases, that juries defer to high-status experts, and so on. Then she discusses the methodologies social scientists have used to try to test these claims and discusses "what we have learned (and not learned) from empirical studies of the jury."
A pdf copy is available on her faculty profile page.
What do Phyllis Diller, Ed Begley Jr., Bruce Vilanch, Paula Poundstone, and Dick Van Patten have to do with trial practice?
They are among the celebrity jurors who'll be on a new syndicated show, "Jury Duty," due for release on Sept. 17. Celebs called for 'Jury Duty,' Hollywood Reporter, July 9, 2007.
The reality show will have a three-person jury consider small claims. If the jury can't agree, then the case will be decided by the judge, Bruce Cutler.
Mr. Cutler is also the lead defense attorney for Phil Spector in his murder trial. He made news by leaving the trial in order to film some episodes of the TV show.
Cutler vowed Monday to deliver the closing argument in the Spector trial even though he will not have been in court for much of the defense case. * * *Lawyer leaves murder trial to tape TV show, LJ World, July 4, 2007.
Cutler might not be breaking any ethical rules by taping the show during the trial, but “it’s certainly unorthodox,” Loyola University Law School professor Laurie Levenson said.
“The ethical question is ‘Can he still reach the level of competence needed to represent a client on a murder charge?”’ Levenson said. “If he’s super lawyer and he can do it, he won’t be violating ethics, but he certainly will raise some eyebrows.”
The trial continues, by the way. On Thursday, the prosecution was presenting rebuttal evidence. For accounts of this celebrity trial, see Court TV, the L.A. Times, or Rolling Stone's blog, The Phil Spector Trial: We Watch Court TV So You Don't Have To.
Thanks: National Center for State Courts, Jur-E Bulletin 08-24-2007.
Friday, August 24, 2007
Douglas A. Berman, the author of Sentencing Law and Policy, discusses United States v. Paul, No. 06-30506, court website (Aug. 17, 2007)(unpublished): Ninth Circuit reverses within-guideline sentence as substantively unreasonable!!, Aug. 17, 2007.
A public defender in Ohio said he wasn't prepared to go forward with a case, since he had only gotten the case the day before. The judge cited him for contempt and had him sit in jail for five hours. Carolyn Elefant tells the story and links to more info: Judge Criticized for Jailing Public Defender Unprepared to Go Forward, Law.com - Inside Opinions: Legal Blogs, Aug. 22, 2007.
Tuesday, August 21, 2007
What if you want to preserve data that's on a computer's hard drive but you don't want to hire aa computer expert? Craig Ball, a trial lawyer and computer forensics special master, offers suggestions in Do-It-Yourself Forensics, Law Technology News, July 12, 2007:
I challenged myself to come up with forensically sound imaging methods for conventional IDE and SATA hard drives -- methods that would be inexpensive, use off-the-shelf and over-the-net tools, yet simple enough for nearly anyone who can safely open the case and remove the drive. In that vein, the safest way to forensically preserve evidence is to employ a qualified computer forensics expert to professionally 'image' the drive and authenticate the duplicate. No one is better equipped to prevent problems or resolve them should they arise.
Interested in technology and techniques for presenting information? Take a look at Trial Presentation Blog. Written by Charles Perez, who puts together visual and audio presentations for lawyers and corporations, it discusses some technical things (like the risks of digital audio that sacrifices fidelity for space) and some not-so-technical things (like how effective it was to impeach a witness by showing a video clip of her deposition alongside images of documents).
Thanks: Internet Legal Research Weekly.
Saturday, August 18, 2007
Ordinarily, awarding attorneys' fees against a consumer plaintiff such as Pearson would be unusual, Bartnoff said.
"But this is an unusual case, in which the plaintiff attempted to take what was at best a misunderstanding about one pair of pants and expand it to a claim of $67 million, based on legal theories that -- once they clearly were articulated -- were unsupported in fact or in law," the judge said.
5.'Pant Suit' Continues With an Appeal
8.Judge Appeals $54M Pants Dismissal
9.Dry Cleaners Cut Plaintiff Some Slack
10.Offbeat : Pearson v. Custom Cleaners The Saga Continues
Thanks: Pamela Gregory
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Division III granted the personal restraint petition of a Yakima man convicted of rape and burglary in 1996. DNA analysis that was not available at the time is persuasive evidence that would likely have changed the jury's verdict. The petitioner, Ted Bradford, has already served his sentence, but he wants to clear his name and remove the obligation to register as a sex offender. DNA evidence overturns Yakima man's rape conviction, Seattle Times, Aug. 15, 2007.
The case is In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Bradford, No. 24448-2-III, Wash. Courts (Aug. 14, 2007).
Mr. Bradford was represented by the Innocence Project Northwest. Prof. Jackie McMurtrie and Trial Ad instructor Felix G. Luna were counsel of record.
Monday, August 13, 2007
In a procedurally tangled case, the Washington Supreme Court upholds dismissal under CR 41(a)(4). Feature Realty, Inc. v. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, No. 79967-9 Wash. Courts website (Aug. 9, 2007).
Feature Realty sued Spokane over a delay in a permit request. The trial court granted summary judgment, but the Supreme Court reversed. For the second go-round, Feature hired Jerry Neal (a partner in Preston Gates & Ellis) and a California attorney named Terrence Butler. They reached a settlement -- but the city backed out because the settlement had violated the Open Public Meetings Act. Feature went to federal court, but E.D. Wash. and the 9th Cir. agreed that the settlement was void.
So Feature sued Neal, Butler, and Neal's law firm for malpractice -- in California. Since the underlying representation was in Washington, the firm moved to stay the complaint based on forum non conveniens and Neal moved to quash the subpoena for lack of personal jurisdiction. Feature tried to keep alive its suit against Butler (the California lawyer) in California, but the California court said huh-uh, so Feature filed in King County and voluntarily dismissed its California suit.
But Feature hadn't timely served the defendants. So it requested dismissal and refiled in King County. The defendants won a motion to have the case transferred to Spokane. And then they moved for summary judgment and won based on CR 41(a)(4):
Unless otherwise stated in the order of dismissal, the [voluntary] dismissal is without prejudice, except that an order of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when obtained by a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action based on or including the same claim in any court of the United States or of any state.In other words, you get one voluntary dismissal free, but the second one counts. One issue on appeal is whether the California appeal should count.
And you thought Civil Procedure was over after your 1L year!
Here's a new book for people trying to understand how the courts do what they do: Frank B. Cross, Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals (KF8990 .C76 2007 at Classified Stacks).
This groundbreaking book analyzes the decisions made by the United States circuit courts over the past half century. These courts have a profound impact on the law—they issue many more decisions in many more areas of law than the Supreme Court. Cross demonstrates that while the courts' judges are influenced by ideology and by the appointing president, legal requirements exercise a much stronger influence on their decisions. He also shows that these courts are independent of the other branches of government and free from undue influence of various parties. The book further introduces new research on the precedent-setting power of decisions.Publisher's description.
Sunday, August 12, 2007
The Washington Supreme Court unanimously construes sections of the Sentencing Reform Act to find that community custody is not mandated for an attempted assault. In re Postsentence Review of Leach, No. 79432-4, Wash. Courts website (Aug. 2, 2007).
RCW 9.94A.715 provides:
(1) When a court sentences a person to the custody of the department for * * * any crime against persons under RCW 9.94A.411(2) * * * , the court shall in addition to the other terms of the sentence, sentence the offender to community custody * * *Flip the pages back to 9.94A.411, and you find:
(2) Decision to prosecute.The table lists lots of crimes against persons, but none of them are attempt crimes.
Crimes against persons will be filed if * * *
Crimes against property/other crimes will be filed if * * *
See table below for the crimes within these categories.
Leach hit her 12-year-old son with a tire iron, and she pleaded guilty to attempted assault of a child in the second degree. She was sentenced to 23.25 months confinement followed by 9-18 months community custody.
The Department of Corrections said that she couldn't be placed in community custody because her crime wasn't in the statutory list. The Attorney General argued that result would be absurd. And, on the facts, it sure does seem nutty that bloodying a boy with a tire iron doesn't count as a crime against a person, but some of the nuttiness comes from the plea: the facts would have supported a charge of assault, but the state accepted a plea of attempted assault.
It's all about reading the statute. The Court says that the legislature could have included attempt crimes in the list -- or it could have said that the list was merely illustrative -- but what it said was: these are the crimes that count as crimes against persons. The Court is there to apply the statute the legislature actually enacted and so, in this case, the defendant will not serve community custody after her confinement.
Thursday, August 9, 2007
When there are disputes about child custody or visitation, the court often orders an evaluation of the parents by an expert. Stuart Greenberg, a psychologist who did a lot of evaluations (with high price tags), was recently discovered to have been videotaping women using the restroom in his office. He committed suicide shortly after his behavior was discovered. Now his recommendations are being questioned, and the P-I is taking a look at the system generally. Families' futures decided with little oversight, Seattle P-I, Aug. 8, 2007.
UW School of Law Affiliate Professor Andy Benjamin is quoted in the article. He is the coauthor of a text from the American Psychological Association describing best practices in family evaluations: G. Andrew H. Benjamin and Jackie K. Gollan, Family Evaluation in Custody Litigation: Reducing Risks of Ethical Infractions and Malpractice (KF505.5 .B46 2003 at Classified Stacks). The APA's description of the book is here.
State standards for parenting evaluations are in WAC 246-924-445. The regulation was adopted June 7, effective July 7.
Thanks: Lisa Kremer.
Dahlia Lithwick has fascinating commentary about language battles in a sexual assault case. A Nebraska judge bans the word rape from his courtroom, Slate.com, June 20, 2007.
The defense successfully moved to bar witnesses from saying "rape," "sexual assault," "victim," and "sexual assault kit." The concern is that "rape" is so inflammatory that jurors would make their decision based on emotion rather than reason. But the victim is left having to describe what she experienced as a rape as "intercourse" or "sex."
The jury deadlocked in the first trial.
The case went to trial again in July, but the judge (Lancaster County District Judge Jeffre Cheuvront) declared a mistrial because of high publicity, including a protest of the language ruling by rape victim advocates. Safi mistrial raises questions about costs, Lincoln Journal Star, July 14, 2007.
See also Putting the Term "Rape" on Trial, Time, July 23, 2007.
How do you discourage police from tardiness, littering, and other minor infractions? To Punish Thai Police, a Hello Kitty Armband, N.Y. Times, Aug. 7, 2007.
"Simple warnings no longer work," said Pongpat Chayaphan, acting chief of the Crime Suppression Division in Bangkok, who instituted the new humiliation this week.If I were posting this over on Bent Law, Peter Nicolas's new blog about gay rights and the law, I might riff on why the color pink and cute kittens should be so profoundly shaming to men (the article doesn't mention any women on the Thai police force). Here, I'll just breathe a sigh of relief that this campaign is just part of cleaning up the force:
"This new twist is expected to make them feel guilt and shame and prevent them from repeating the offense, no matter how minor," he said. “Kitty is a cute icon for young girls. It’s not something macho police officers want covering their biceps."
Pink armbands for misdemeanors are a start. Stronger measures could be next for corruption and extrajudicial killings.Extrajudicial killings: now those would take something a little stronger than a white kitten with wideset eyes.
Wonder if this will be added to Hello Kitty's profile?
Thanks: Michele Storms.
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Lewis County (Centralia) Prosecutor Michael Golden had a sexual relationship with a woman whose son was charged with arson. He says the relationship ended when the boy was arrested; she says they had detailed conversations about the son's case and defense strategy. After the son pleaded guilty, the mother told the defense attorney about the relationship, and he moved for the case to be dismissed and the Prosecutor's Office to be disqualified from the case. The two superior court judges in the county removed themselves from the case, and Chief Justice Alexander has appointed Judge Gary Tabor (Thurston County) to hear the case. Lewis County judges remove themselves from prosecutor case, Seattle Times, Aug. 7, 2007.
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
In case you're looking for information about the three candidates for King County Prosecutor, here are their websites:
I indicated their parties just because that's the way it's set up. I'm not sure that Prosecutor should be a partisan position. We vote for King County Sheriff and King County Superior Court judges without knowing party affiliations -- why not the Prosecutor? Able administration and commitment to justice aren't R or D (or in the color coding that became popular after the 2000 election, red or blue). I asked about this at the forum this afternoon. Both Bill Sherman and Keith Scully said they supported the office being nonpartisan.
But now the candidates run by party. So on Aug. 21, Democrats can vote for either Sherman or Scully and Republicans can vote for Satterberg. Candidates in the primary -- for both county-wide and city races -- are listed here, in an online voters' pamphlet.
This afternoon at 4:00 candidates for King County Prosecutor will appear at a forum "Co-sponsored by the Asian Bar Association of Washington, King County Washington Women Lawyers, Korean Bar Association of Washington, Latina/o Bar Association of Washington, the Northwest Indian Bar Association, * * * the South Asian Bar Association of Washington, and Vietnamese Bar Association of Washington." Announcement from Washington Women Lawyers, July 31, 2007.
Tues. Aug. 7
Gates Hall Room 138
(This is the information I've been able to gather about the forum. It is in the law school's room reservation calendar, but I haven't seen flyers. The only event Dan Satterberg's website lists for today is a dinner at 6:00. Then again, Keith Scully's website has nothing on the calendar for August and Bill Sherman's website has no calendar. This forum -- if it's really a go -- is definitely under publicized.)
Update (5:35): I'm sitting in the forum as it winds down. Keith Scully and Bill Sherman both came. With about a dozen people in the audience, they engaged in a good discussion (somewhat more casual than it would have been with a packed room) of a wide variety of issues -- juvenile justice, case management, areas for reform, and others.
This Week in Law discusses Avvo, the Seattle-based company that rates lawyers, in its latest episode. (Hat tip: Internet Legal Research Weekly.)
Avvo's blog (Avvoblog, aptly enough) has notes about the company and related topics, such as lawyer advertising. Avvo's motion to dismiss the class action complaint filed against it (W.D. Wash.) is here (June 28, 2007). The first page of the motion indicated it was on the motion calendar for July 20. I don't know what, if anything, has happened with the case since then.
Monday, August 6, 2007
The New York Times opines:
One part of the Justice Department mess that requires more scrutiny is the growing evidence that the department may have singled out people for criminal prosecution to help Republicans win elections. The House Judiciary Committee has begun investigating several cases that raise serious questions. The panel should determine what role politics played in all of them.Selective Prosecution, N.Y. Times, Aug. 6, 2007.
Thanks: Maureen Howard.
U.S. Marshals Let Fugitives Come to Them, in Church, New York Times, Aug. 5, 2007.
The U.S. Marshals Service has run this program -- "Fugitive Safe Surrender" -- in five cities so far, cooperating with local law enforcement and courts. Many people who are fugitives have fairly minor offenses, compounded by missed court dates, and are relieved to work out deals.
Thanks: Maureen Howard.
The P-I launched a three-day investigative series ("Undue Influence") on law enforcement officers who drive drunk and often receive very light discipline. The lead story was A broken system works in favor of cops busted for DUI, Seattle P-I, Aug.6, 2007.
Remember the DC Administrative Law Judge who sued a dry cleaners for millions of dollars because of a mixup with his pants? I haven't covered it since my first post, but it's gotten a lot of attention elsewhere as an example of litigiousness run amok.
The trial court ruled for the cleaners, but the judge is planning to appeal. A fundraiser last week garnered $62,000 for Chungs, the couple that owns the dry cleaners -- with $30,000 donated earlier, they're almost out of the hole, but an appeal would cost more.
Now the Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges is deciding whether to recommend his reappointment (his first term expired recently). Raw Fisherfrom Marc Fisher's Blog - Commission Weighs Future of Litigious Judge, Wash. Post, Aug. 3, 2007.
Thanks: Pamela Gregory.
Sunday, August 5, 2007
Suja A. Thomas, Why Summary Judgment is Unconstitutional, 93 Va. L. Rev. 139 (2007):
The Essay concludes that, despite the uniform acceptance of the device, summary judgment is unconstitutional. The Essay then responds to likely objections, including that the federal courts cannot function properly without summary judgment. By describing the burden that the procedure of summary judgment imposes upon litigants and the courts, the Essay argues that summary judgment is not necessary to the judicial system but rather, by contrast, imposes significant costs upon the system.
"Scott Dodson, Pleading Standards After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 93 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 121 (2007), html, pdf looks at the recent U.S. Supreme Court case on how much a complaint needs to have in order to survive a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
George M. Cohen, Of Coerced Waiver, Government Leverage, and Corporate Loyalty: The Holder, Thompson, and McNulty Memos and Their Critics, 93 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 137 (2007), html, pdf, examines the flap about the McNulty Memo (and its predecessors) and concludes that the "coercion" involved in requiring corporations to waive privilege in order to be seen as "cooperating" with an investigation is just not a big deal.
Cohen's concluding paragraph:
The vehemence of corporate opposition to the government’s waiver policy may be a matter of whose ox is being gored. It is one thing when the corporation on its own wants to finger some low-level employee and label him a “bad egg” acting contrary to company policy so that the corporation can avoid prosecution. It is quite another when internal investigations turn up evidence of misbehavior at the highest levels and diffused throughout the organization. But that is what the recent corporate scandals are all about. The “coercion” that corporations claim to suffer may in fact be the discomfort that upper-level executives feel when they have to choose between waiving the privilege for the good of the company and saving their own necks. If so, then criticism that has been dressed up as a noble stand in defending a venerable privilege against government abuse is in reality just the corporate bar’s age-old attempt to protect upper-level corporate management rather than the entity client that corporate lawyers are supposed to serve. That would not be a surprise. The surprise is that people have been taken in for so long.
In Opinion | Split the Justice Department to keep politics, prosecution separate, Seattle Times, Aug. 1, 2007, UW affiliate professor Hugh D. Spitzer suggests that Congress could create one agency to be the public prosecutor for the federal government and another to be the President's advisers. He talks about a green paper proposing a similar solution int he UK.
Saturday, August 4, 2007
I just listened to the podcast of Justice Talking's episode, "Is Crystal Meth the New Crack? (released Nov. 20, 2006). A summary of the different segments is on the show's webpage, so you don't have to commit to the whole program (but I thought the whole thing was interesting).
Methamphetamine has a wide impact: health, violence, identity theft, ordinary theft, children in foster care (someone cited an amazingly high percentage of cases where a parent was a meth user).
In one segment, two speakers debated whether meth is a national epidemic. Joe Dunn, the legislative director from the National Association of Counties (NACo) said yes. Ryan King, a policy analyst for the Sentencing Project said that characterizing it that way skews national drug policy.
Mr. King is the author of The Next Big Thing? Methamphetamine in the United States (June 2006). NACo has a Meth Action Clearinghouse.
- Introduction . . . Anita Bernstein, Marc Galanter & Tanina Rostain
- How Social Hierarchies Within the Personal Injury Bar Affect Case Screening Decisions . . . Mary Nell Trautner
- How the Spider Catches the Fly: Referral Networks in the Plaintiffs' Personal Injury Bar . . . Sara Parikh
- Texas Plaintiffs' Practice in the Age of Tort Reform: Survival of the Fittest – It's Even More True Now . . . Stephen Daniels & Joanne Martin
- Blame it on the Bee Gees: The Attack on Trial Lawyers and Civil Justice . . . Robert S. Peck & John Vail
- How the Plaintiffs' Bar Bars Plaintiffs . . . Richard L. Abel
See Janelle L. Davis, Comment, Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But Names Could Get Me a Mistrial: An Examination of Name-Calling in Closing Argument in Civil Cases, 42 Gonz. L. Rev. 133-171 (2006-2007), Westlaw, LexisNexis.
An introductory section (at 136-42) offers a good overview of the law of closing argument -- advocates may not: interject their personal beliefs, refer to inadmissible evidence, invite the jury to speculate on missing evidence, misstate the law, make Golden Rule arguments, argue for jury nullification, appeal to passion and prejudice. And of course, this last -- appealing to passion and prejudice is where name-calling comes in, and that's the rest of the comment. Ms. Davis reviews cases from around the country and considers the applicable Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
Friday, August 3, 2007
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review has had some interesting symposia lately, and the articles are available in pdf on the web:
- Access To Justice: the Economics of Civil Justice, v.39 n.2, Aug. 2006. Includes:
- Medical Malpractice Myths and Realities: Why an Insurance Crisis is Not a Lawsuit Crisis by Douglas A. Kysar, Thomas O. McGarity & Karen Sokol
- Tort Reform--What About the Little Guy? by Dawn House
- The Politics of Criticizing Judges by Anthony Champagne
- Developments in the Law: the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 , v.39 n.3, Sept. 2006.
- Celebrity Prosecutions, v. 39 n.4, Dec. 2006.
Sasha Abramsky on the 'Age of Mass Imprisonment'KUOW Speakers Forum archive. Abramsky's website is here.
Sasha Abramsky says America is a prison nation. His third book on the United States' criminal justice system takes an investigative look at prisons. He says most people don't think of prisons when they think about the American story, but, in fact, thanks to twenty–five years of policy changes, prisons are our story. Abramsky follows up Conned and Hard Time Blues with American Furies: Crime, Punishment, and Vengeance in the Age of Mass Imprisonment. Abramsky spoke at Elliott Bay Book Company in Seattle on June 7th, 2007.
Very interesting -- worth a listen or a read, I think.
Thursday, August 2, 2007
Jeffrey Toobin reports on the murder of Seattle Assistant U.S. Attorney Tom Wales in 2001: A Reporter at Large: An Unsolved Killing, New Yorker, Aug. 6, 2007. The subtitle asks: "What does the firing of a U.S. Attorney have to do with murder case?"
Congress is trying to undo the impact of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., the recent Supreme Court case limiting the right to sue to discriminatory acts within 180 days, regardless of when the plaintiff discovered the discrimination, the effects of which linger on in lower paychecks month after month (earlier post). Ledbetter Bill Passes House, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights press release, July 31.
The House bill is the Lill Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2007, H.R. 2831. The Senate bill is the Fair Pay Restoration Act, S. 1843.
In Justice in Mississippi: The Murder Trial of Edgar Ray Killen (KF224.K55 B35 2006 at Good Reads), Howard Ball tells the story of the recent trial for the killings of civil rights workers in the 1960s. Here's the publisher's decription:
The slaying of three civil rights workers in Philadelphia, Mississippi, in 1964 was a notorious event documented in Howard Ball’s 2004 book Murder in Mississippi. Now Ball revisits that grisly crime to tell how, four decades later, justice finally came to Philadelphia.Murder in Mississippi is at KF224.M47 B35 2004 at Classified Stacks.
Originally tried in 1967, Baptist minister and Klansman Edgar Ray Killen was set free because one juror couldn’t bring herself to convict a preacher. Now Ball tells how progressive-minded state officials finally re-opened the case and, forty years after the fact, enabled Mississippians to reconcile with their tragic past.
The second trial of 80-year-old “Preacher” Killen, who was convicted by a unanimous jury, took place in June 2005, with the verdict delivered on the forty-first anniversary of the crime. Ball, himself a former civil rights activist, attended the trial and interviewed most of the participants, as well as local citizens and journalists covering the proceedings.
Ball retraces the cycle of events that led to the resurrection of this “cold case,” from the attention generated by the film Mississippi Burning to a new state attorney general’s quest for closure. He reviews the strategies of the prosecution and defense and examines the evidence introduced at the trial—as well as evidence that could not be presented—and also relates first-hand accounts of the proceedings, including his unnerving staring contest with Killen himself from only ten feet away.
Ball explores the legal, social, political, and pseudo-religious roots of the crime, including the culture of impunity that shielded from prosecution whites who killed blacks or “outside agitators.” He also assesses the transformation in Mississippi’s life and politics that allowed such a case to be tried after so long. Indeed, the trial itself was a major catalytic force for change in Mississippi, enabling Mississippians to convey a much more positive national image for their state.
Ball’s gripping account illuminates all of this and shows that, despite racism’s long stranglehold on the Deep South, redemption is not beyond the grasp of those who envision a more just society.
Accusations against the former manager of the Washington State Patrol's toxicology laboratory could leave hundreds of drunken driving cases and some drug cases in question, lawyers say.Crime lab officials say that there are redundant checks, so one person's lapse does not invalidate the tests. However,
The manager, Ann Marie Gordon, resigned July 20 after the patrol began investigating an anonymous tip that she failed to check a solution as required before signing sworn statements that breath test machines were functioning properly.
"I think this is an issue for every DUI case currently pending in this state," said Francisco A. Duarte, a lawyer in Bellevue. "Every single machine in the state of Washington relies on the solution prepared by the Washington state toxicology lab."Mr. Duarte is a Trial Ad instructor at the UW.